Newt, President Obama may be indecisive in handling world affairs, but at least he did not hesitate for one second to make it clear to the world in 2007 that he wanted very much to run for and win the presidency. We knew what he wanted, even if we were unsure of exactly what he was politically, or what he might do once in office. His ambitions were no secret. Neither are yours, yet you approach them as if you should keep them to yourself until the last moment. Campaign seasons are starting earlier and earlier, and those who know what they want and go all out for it, like candidate Obama did in 2007-2008, have more opportunity to influence voters.
Newt has had since the late 1990s to explore his viability as a candidate for the presidency. He has been a rumored candidate in several previous presidential elections, and his strengths and weaknesses (skeletons may be a more accurate term) have been vetted in the media ever since he led the Congress that impeached President Clinton. The media will continue to attack him and dredge up any and all past indiscretions whether he throws his hat into the presidential campaign ring or not, because Newt has palpable influence on conservative political thought.
Whether he enters the race today, 6 months from now, or not at all, he will be targeted by the White House and its media accomplices who view him as an ever-present threat to liberal ideology. President Obama does not want to participate in any televised debates with Newt, who is far more prepared, articulate, and experienced in world affairs. The White House would prefer almost any other potential GOP candidate to square off against. What Newt will discover during his announced 6-7 week exploratory period is that he scares people on the left, and I don't mean because they consider his views radically conservative. He scares them because he would be their most formidable foe. Likewise, fellow conservatives seeking the White House fear Newt above all other potential opponents. Newt's war chest is already building more rapidly than any other potential conservative candidate's.
In his sharp criticisms of the Obama Administration delivered at CPAC 2011, Newt aggressively stated his domestic priorities: dramatic cuts to Federal government spending; dramatic permanent tax cuts for all taxpayers, which leads to business expansion and more jobs; and aggressive pursuit of domestic energy sources to lessen our dependence on Middle East regimes.
Although Newt wasn't exactly decisive on running for president in his exploratory announcement, his broadside attack on President Obama's foreign policy and national security indecision covered a lot of ground in just three sentences and illustrated why a debate matchup of President Obama and Newt Gingrich would be intriguing:
This was an administration which was very aggressive about an American ally, Mubarak in Egypt, and very confused about an American opponent, Gadhafi in Libya. This is an administration which doesn't notice the demonstrations and the brutality in Tehran, and it confuses Israelis building apartments with Iranians building nuclear weapons. And I think it's very, very dangerous.Newt, if, as you say, at the end of your exploratory period (that you've had 15 years to explore) you expect to be in the race, get in now and be a decisive conservative leader. Candidate Obama was in the race to win it already by March 2007. He even had Secret Service protection that early, which certainly enhanced his image of viability as potential winner of his party's nomination. Potential voters knew his ambitions, and he was not apologetic or modest about them. Voters want decisiveness in their leaders. Be all in, or all out, but never waffling in between two choices. The Bible tells us it is better to be hot or cold, than to be lukewarm in our commitments. If you lack the heart or the stomach for the long-haul campaign and the incredible pressures of the presidency if victorious, step aside now for someone with more vigor who is sure of what he or she wants. If you have the heart and stomach for the brutality of a campaign and the job itself, then get in it to win it.
